[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v3 4/5] doc: Propose STRUCTURED_REPLY extension



On 31 Mar 2016, at 19:50, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote:

>> I'd also like to say "I'd like my offsets / lengths to be a multiple of 4k"
>> so I can open O_DIRECT. Or at least say "can you cope with only offsets /
>> lengths that are a multiple of 4k, as if so I can perform better". But
>> this should probably be on a different wish-list!
> 
> Yep, several emails now hinting that we want to add an extension for
> length negotiation; I've started a strawman locally, but it's not
> polished enough to post yet, with all the churn on structured replies first.

Yep. nbdclient.c even takes a blocksize on the command-line (defaulting
to 1024), then (in setsizes()) does an ioctl to the kernel, so it would
be really useful to let the server specify / request this.

--
Alex Bligh




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Reply to: