[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 2/2] Correct definition of NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA



On 31 Mar 2016, at 20:14, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote:

>> 
>> 
>> Should we produce a new name for it (and future command flags)
>> that aren't shifted left 16 places, and just maintain the
>> current value for compatibility?
> 
> I don't see the point.  Your fix looks correct.

OK. And the wrongness hasn't yet got into /usr/include/linux/nbd.h
or include/uapi/linux/nbd.h ; these have no reference to FUA at all,
even though it does have NBD_FLAG_SEND_FLUSH, which is odd as I added
both flags at the same time.

So I'm guessing it's safe.

--
Alex Bligh




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Reply to: