Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 2/2] Correct definition of NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA
On 31 Mar 2016, at 19:15, Alex Bligh <alex@...872...> wrote:
> It is doubtful whether anyone is using NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA
> at the moment in any case.
Drat. I spoke too soon. Qemu uses it, but presumably from its
own .h file.
However, it's now nonsensical having it defined as 1<<16 in a
16 bit flags variable.
Should we produce a new name for it (and future command flags)
that aren't shifted left 16 places, and just maintain the
current value for compatibility?
--
Alex Bligh
Reply to: