Re: [Nbd] Proposal to merge WRITE_ZEROES extension into master
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] Proposal to merge WRITE_ZEROES extension into master
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:41:43 +0100
- Message-id: <20161219214143.jhgno7krc7fpgmjy@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <20161215110942.6xepfmak53kgr4wc@...3...>
- References: <BC48D5D1-550F-4EE3-BC84-623AE864FB3A@...872...> <20161214181434.ko22eeq6vnwpakh2@...3...> <75E8140C-3000-4500-89A4-71A26040ADE4@...872...> <0132c6df-dbcf-b55a-6b56-f3279c825f1a@...696...> <4888CDE5-8CAD-4F0F-ABBC-6C904EC96ED0@...872...> <71fc32d7-2e5b-28c8-ec45-893daf5710d7@...696...> <FE824089-E29F-4894-B9CC-6A3CBC421CD6@...872...> <20161215110942.6xepfmak53kgr4wc@...3...>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:09:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Eric's patch makes -d work again, but disables maxconnections in that
> case. I'll need to fix it up; hopefully that'll happen sometime next
> week, because otherwise I'll be too late to make the Debian freeze for
> stretch, and I'd really like STARTTLS to be in there.
I'm an idiot :-)
When we say "don't fork", that means we cannot handle more than one
connection, because we can't fork, and we do fork-per-child.
I'll apply Eric's patch, it's the correct thing to do.
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: