Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv5 6/7] Add options to nbd-client for TLS support
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv5 6/7] Add options to nbd-client for TLS support
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 12:53:46 +0200
- Message-id: <20160504105346.GA19575@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <38B30B06-B2FB-4ADF-A138-793A45377C73@...872...>
- References: <1462281255-20717-1-git-send-email-alex@...872...> <1462281255-20717-7-git-send-email-alex@...872...> <20160504044703.GD15685@...3...> <38B30B06-B2FB-4ADF-A138-793A45377C73@...872...>
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:37:24AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 4 May 2016, at 05:47, Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:14:14PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > TLS and swap do not mix well. The client should probably issue an error
> > (or at the very least, a warning) when someone does try to combine them.
>
> You mean the swap *option*? Sure. I think a warning is probably better.
Possibly.
> I can't tell (I don't think) whether it's actually being used for swap.
Don't think so either.
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: