Hi, On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:53:07PM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote: > Dear Markus, > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:56:15PM +0200, Andrey Utkin wrote: > > >>>2015-01-13 21:26 GMT+02:00 Paul Clements <paul.cleme...@...856...>: > > >>>> - what are critical bugs or important issues requiring work, if there are > > >>>> any. > > >>> > > >>> There is a network timeout issue, which is probably one of the more > > >>> important fixes to get in: > > >>> > > >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770479 > > >> > > >> > > >>Looking at the proposed patch, it looks quite smart, and looking good > > >>as long as it is tested. Going to test that ASAP. > > > > > > I tested it successfully on a jessie kernel in December, > > > what was your result ? > > tested the mentioned patch (inluded below) with vanilla 3.19 and it works as > expected - i.e. breaking a raid1 within the specified timeout of 5s instead of > hanging until the disconnected network is reconnecting again. > > > Sorry, I haven't tested it personally. > > So now: > Tested-By: Hermann Lauer <Hermann.Lauer@...1489...> First of all thanks for testing this. Unfortunately the included patch is missing a Signed-off-by tag (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches), so I didn't have a deeper look into it. However, I have a testsetup now to reproduce the timeout issues and I see the problem. I also started looking at the timeout patch from 2013. @Michal: Maybe you are interested to resend the patch with your signed-off-by so we can discuss it? Best Regards, Markus -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature