Re: [Nbd] nbd 2.9.11 compilation failure
- To: Gerhard Brauer <gerhard.brauer@...186...>
- Cc: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] nbd 2.9.11 compilation failure
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 22:14:05 +0200
- Message-id: <20080516201405.GA22460@...172...>
- In-reply-to: <20080516074231.GA4807@...187...>
- References: <20080515122615.GA7507@...187...> <20080515142831.GD7507@...187...> <20080515192730.GA9427@...172...> <200805152233.51913.vapier@...103...> <20080516074231.GA4807@...187...>
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 07:42:35AM +0000, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what crack I was on when I made this the *default*, but
> > > it's gone now, and won't be coming back any time soon. Sorry for the
> > > trouble, people.
>
> No problem! I'm more happy with the knowledge of upstream mailing list
> when saying: we have tried something, now we *know* that was a "mistake".
Actually, that was code in progress which should never have been in the
repository in the first place; it wasn't ready. Another reason why I
should switch to git (working on that).
> > huge thank you from the Gentoo side :)
> And from Archlinux too ;-)
Does that mean I can update the README? ;-)
--
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
Reply to: