Re: [Nbd] nbd 2.9.11 compilation failure
- To: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] nbd 2.9.11 compilation failure
- From: Gerhard Brauer <gerhard.brauer@...186...>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 07:42:35 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <20080516074231.GA4807@...187...>
- In-reply-to: <200805152233.51913.vapier@...103...>
- References: <20080515122615.GA7507@...187...> <20080515142831.GD7507@...187...> <20080515192730.GA9427@...172...> <200805152233.51913.vapier@...103...>
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 15 May 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > You can use --without-klcc, too, since 2.9.11 (if I'm not mistaken)
>
> unfortunately, that isnt true. the autoconf code was broken and
> so --without-klcc would actually fail badly. that's why i didnt suggest it.
That's right. I used configure.ac diff from svn to 2.9.11 to get a
working --without-klcc.
And - as a non-developer - now i know forwhat the tools autoconf and
autoreconf are used for. Costs me an half hour to solve why the patch
wasn't applying and usefull :-)
> > I'm not sure what crack I was on when I made this the *default*, but
> > it's gone now, and won't be coming back any time soon. Sorry for the
> > trouble, people.
No problem! I'm more happy with the knowledge of upstream mailing list
when saying: we have tried something, now we *know* that was a "mistake".
> huge thank you from the Gentoo side :)
And from Archlinux too ;-)
> -mike
Regards
Gerhard
--
Standards sind eine tolle Sache.
Ich finde, jeder sollte einen haben.
Reply to: