Re: more on hanging tests
Yes. I see from the journal that there were actually several tests.
10|631 /tset/LSB.os/procprim/execle/T.execle 21:38:34|TC Start, scenario
ref 636-0
15|631 3.3-lite 5|TCM Start
400|631 1 1 21:38:34|IC Start
200|631 1 21:38:34|TP Start
220|631 1 4 21:38:34|UNSUPPORTED
410|631 1 1 21:38:34|IC End
400|631 2 1 21:38:34|IC Start
200|631 2 21:38:34|TP Start
220|631 2 0 21:38:34|PASS
410|631 2 1 21:38:34|IC End
400|631 3 1 21:38:34|IC Start
200|631 3 21:38:34|TP Start
220|631 3 0 21:38:35|PASS
410|631 3 1 21:38:35|IC End
400|631 4 1 21:38:35|IC Start
200|631 4 21:38:35|TP Start
520|631 4 00019923 2 1|unexpected signal 2 (SIGINT) received
220|631 4 2 08:11:34|UNRESOLVED
410|631 4 1 08:11:34|IC End
400|631 5 1 08:11:34|IC Start
200|631 5 08:11:34|TP Start
520|631 5 00019923 1 1|_POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING not supported
220|631 5 4 08:11:34|UNSUPPORTED
410|631 5 1 08:11:34|IC End
520|631 4 00020129 1 1|unexpected signal 11 (SIGSEGV) received
90|08:11:34|User Abort
80|631 0 08:11:34|TC End, scenario ref 636-0
In this case, the probem may be an unexpected SIGINT.
John
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 23:05, Andrew Josey wrote:
> On Jun 13, 10:03am in "more on hanging test", John Cherry wrote:
> > With a stock RH 7.2 (2.4.7-10 kernel), I reran the runtime tests using
> > 1.1.10-1. The following tests hung:
> >
> > /tset/LSB.os/procprim/execle/T.execle
> > /tset/LSB.os/procprim/execvp/T.execvp
> >
> > The report (see below) indicated that both of these tests were
> > "Unsupported". Should an "Unsupported" test hang?
> >
> Remember that each test contains multiple testcases, ie. test
> assertions, some of which might be unsupported. So what you
> are seeing is normal. That version of the kernel has known
> problems wrt to LSB conformance.
> regards
> Andrew
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org
Reply to: