Re: SI packages

To: gk4@austin.ibm.com, "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>, lsb-test@lists.linuxbase.org
Cc: lsb-impl@list.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: SI packages
From: Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:18:09 +0100
Message-id: <1020607091809.ZM14972@skye.rdg.opengroup.org>
In-reply-to: George Kraft IV's message as of May 30, 4:18pm.
References: <XFMail.20020530140152.shalehperry@attbi.com> <3CF69716.30B7A88B@austin.ibm.com>

These are build side issues and not runtime issues.

For certification the binary packages should be used.

lex, yacc and ed are also POSIX.2 utilities. 

regards
Andrew

On May 30,  4:18pm in "Re: SI packages", George Kraft IV wrote:
> I think the issue is the test suite is using some non-LSB commands like lex,
> yacc, and ed.
> 
> George (gk4)
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org
>-- End of excerpt from George Kraft IV



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-test-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SI packages
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>

Prev by Date: NEW Consumer TELEMARKETING List
Next by Date: Reminder Bug reporting (was Re: problems with usergroups/T.misc test)
Previous by thread: NEW Consumer TELEMARKETING List
Next by thread: Re: SI packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread