Re: waivers which should be none

[Andrew Josey <ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org>]

Thorsten,

Thanks for your mail.

On Jan 8,  9:44am in "waivers which should", Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
>
> In waivers-1.1.txt are some waivers, where I think they should not
> be there, because fixes exists:
>
> /tset/LSB.os/devclass/grantpt_L/T.grantpt_L-3
>
> Works for me. The reason that this test fails are, that the
> test user was logged in with "su". If you login on a normal terminal
> as vsx0 or via ssh, it should work (would be nice if somebody else
> could verify that this is really the reason).
>
Yes I agree. We have corrected the advice for running the suites, to
state that you should login rather than su to get the correct
results. There may also be a couple of other tests that would
also fail (i cannot recall if getlogin is tested) if you su'd
rather than login.


regards
Andrew