[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Turbolinux 65 & LSB os 1.0.2.1beta



I think turbo 6.5 is just too crusty for decent results.  It seemed to do
much better when we ran it with a 2.4.9 kernel.  Anybody know what impacts
the kernel have on these test, in regards to 2.2 vs. 2.4?

I'm going to try to build a turbo 7.0 workstation box today.  It ships
with a newer kernel and libraries, so maybe we'll get better results.

Arnold


On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Lisa Sarabia wrote:

> Has anyone had a problem running the OS test on out of the box TurboLinux
> 65? It seems to be killing the tests. Here is a screen capture of the
> screen output, journal, and report of the run. I have run the test twice &
> both times it didn't finish. Is there anything I can do to get the test to
> complete?
>
> Chris -- This is definitely going to impact the database work you are
> doing. The Turbo report that Arnold sent you has the same problem.
>
> Executing testsets
> tcc: journal file is /home/tet/test_sets/results/0002e/journal
> 10:57:45  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_cancel/T.aio_cancel
> 10:58:37  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_error/T.aio_error
> 10:58:52  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_fsync/T.aio_fsync
> 10:58:53  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_read/T.aio_read
> 10:59:23  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_read_X/T.aio_read_X
> 10:59:24  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_return/T.aio_return
> 10:59:45  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_suspend/T.aio_suspend
> 11:04:02  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_write/T.aio_write
> 11:05:03  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/aio_write_X/T.aio_write_X
> 11:05:04  Execute /tset/LSB.os/aio/lio_listio/T.lio_listio
> run_testsets.sh: line 14:  2983 Killed                  tcc -p -e -s
> $HOME/scen.exec $*
> Results:
> Total tests:            104     PASS = 73       FAIL = 31
>
> Pass Breakdown:
> Number of successes:    28      Number of warnings:     0
> Number unsupported:     26      Number not in use:      1
> Number of untested:     18      Number of FIP:          0
> Unapproved assertions:  0       Number not implemented: 0
>
> Failure Breakdown:
> Number of failures:     29      Number unresolved:      2
> Number uninitiated:     0       Number unreported:      0
>
> A formal report has been saved in /home/tet/test_sets/results/report
> warning: journal file does not end with correct control sequence
> vrpt.page: completed page 25
>
>
> (See attached file: turbo65osjournal)
>
> Any help is greatly appreciate,
>
> Lisa Sarabia
> SW Engineer
> Linux Technology Center
> (512) 838-9466
> T/L 678-9466



Reply to: