LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian Sample Implementation
In the comparison of LSB 1.0 and Debian described at,
http://people.debian.org/~taggart/lsb/
I defined a Debian LSB 1.0 Sample Implementation and ran the LSB test suite
against it. This message is digest of the failures for the test suite listed.
LSB.fhs
-------
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/etc/etc-tc 7
"/etc/gettydefs: file not found"
This is only provided by the Debian "gettyps" package which is non-free.
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/etc/etc-tc 29
"/etc/hosts.equiv: file not found"
Provided by the Debian "rsh-server" server. rsh is not required by the LSB.
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/etc/etc-tc 30
"/etc/hosts.lpd: file not found"
Not in Debian
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/etc/etc-tc 38
"/etc/sgml: directory not found"
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/etc-x11/etc-x11-tc 2
"/etc/X11/XF86Config"
Needs to be done manually?
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/etc-x11/etc-x11-tc 3
"/etc/X11/Xmodmap: file not found"
In "xbase-clients" Debian package
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/sbin/sbin-tc 17
"/sbin/fastboot: file does not exist or is not executable"
Not in Debian (es and ja manpages do exist though)
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/sbin/sbin-tc 18
"/sbin/fasthalt: file does not exist or is not executable"
Not in Debian (es and ja manpages do exist though)
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/bin/bin-tc 4
"/usr/bin/tclsh: No such file or directory"
Provided by tcl8.* (tcl8.3 is the latest currently)
Is tcl required by the LSB?
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/bin/bin-tc 5
"/usr/bin/mh: directory not found"
Provided by Debian "mh" or "nmh" packages.
Is mh required by the LSB?
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/bin/bin-tc 6
"/usr/bin/wish: does not exist or is not executable"
Provided by tk8.* (tk8.3 is the latest currently)
Is tk required by the LSB?
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/bin/bin-tc 7
"/usr/bin/expect: does not exist or is not executable"
Provided by expect* (expect5.31 is the latest currently)
Is expect required by the LSB?
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/share/share-tc 3
"/usr/share/games: directory not found"
Add to base-files
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/share/share-tc 6
"/usr/share/nls: directory not found"
Add to base-files?
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/share/share-tc 8
"/usr/share/tmac: directory not found"
Add to base-files?
/tset/LSB.fhs/var/cache-fonts/cache-fonts-tc 1
"/var/cache/fonts: directory not found"
Add to base files? Nothing in Debian uses it.
/tset/LSB.fhs/var/games/games-tc 1
"/var/games: directory not found"
Add to base-files
/tset/LSB.fhs/var/spool-lpd/spool-lpd-tc 2
"/var/spool/lpd/lpd.lock: file not found"
Not in Debian
/tset/LSB.fhs/var/spool-rwho/spool-rwho-tc 1
"/var/spool/rwho: directory not found"
Not in Debian
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/etc-opt/etc-opt-tc 1
"/etc/opt: directory not found"
Add to base-files?
/tset/LSB.fhs/root/opt/opt-tc 1
"/opt: directory not found"
Add to base-files?
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/x11r6/x11r6-tc 2
"The symbolic link /usr/bin/X11 shall exist and point to /usr/X11R6/bin"
On Debian it looks like "/usr/bin/X11 -> ../X11R6/bin" Is this acceptable?
Fix the test?
/tset/LSB.fhs/usr/lib/lib-tc 2
"stderr:/usr/lib/sendmail expected to be symlink to /usr/sbin/sendmail,
pointed to /usr/sbin/exim"
Test is broken
/tset/LSB.fhs/var/opt/opt-tc 1
"/var/opt: directory not found"
Add to base-files?
Reply to: