Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Cc: Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net>, kragen@pobox.com, tytso@mit.edu, quinlan@transmeta.com, alan@cymru.net, gordon.m.tetlow@vanderbilt.edu, florian@suse.de, hpa@transmeta.com, ewt@redhat.com, fhs-discuss@UCSD.Edu, ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org, lsb-test@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, lsb-test@lists.linuxbase.org, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- From: "Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo" <jake@nodomainname.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:10:09 -0800 (PST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.04.9901260906410.101-100000@elijah.nodomainname.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] m1058WR-0007U1C@the-village.bc.nu>
This is getting WAY out of hand here. How about this:
The mail spool MUST be accessible through /var/mail AND /var/spool/mail,
and spool files MUST take the form /var/{spool/}mail/$LOGNAME. Either
/var/mail or /var/spool/mail, or both, MAY be symbolic links to another
directory. It is RECOMMENDED that /var/mail be the actual directory and
/var/spool/mail be the symbolic link. At some point use of /var/spool/mail
may become deprecated.
+-----------------------------+--------------------------------+
| Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo | jake@nodomainname.net |
| NoDomainName Networks | http://www.nodomainname.net |
| AtDot E-mail Services | http://www.atdot.org |
+-----------------------------+--------------------------------+
Reply to: