Re: shells present on an LSB system
> On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > And then there is the issue of referencing a /bin/sh standard. If not
> > > POSIX, then a predecessor. Maybe the XPG3 Shell specifcation, as
> > > suggested by Andrew Josey.
> > >
> > > I'd like us to specify POSIX.2 in the draft for now.
> >
> > Definitely - but why call it /bin/sh ?
>
> Think of it as source compatability with other UNIX systems.
I prefer to think of it as breakage of back compatibility of other LINUX
systems first.
Reply to: