Re: Bug#134658: ITP: lsb -- Linux Standard Base 1.1 core support package
>From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>> Frankly, I can't see any reason why uid/gid 1 should be assumed to be
>> bin, especially since no other UIDs and GIDs are static (except 0,
>> which is embedded in the kernel design...). After all, that's why we
>> have getpwuid()...
>Agreed. The rest of the thread is junk but the basic initial question is a
>good one - why was bin forced to 1 ?
In principle there is no reason to force a specifiv number.
However there is a reason to force identical numbers to allow NFS mounting of /usr.
If you decide on the numbers it would probably make sense to check the SYSvr4
passwd file because most commercial UNIX versions out use this mapping.
root:x:0:1:Super-User:/:/sbin/sh
daemon:x:1:1::/:
bin:x:2:2::/usr/bin:
sys:x:3:3::/:
adm:x:4:4:Admin:/var/adm:
lp:x:71:8:Line Printer Admin:/usr/spool/lp:
uucp:x:5:5:uucp Admin:/usr/lib/uucp:
nuucp:x:9:9:uucp Admin:/var/spool/uucppublic:/usr/lib/uucp/uucico
smmsp:x:25:25:SendMail Message Submission Program:/:
listen:x:37:4:Network Admin:/usr/net/nls:
nobody:x:60001:60001:Nobody:/:
noaccess:x:60002:60002:No Access User:/:
nobody4:x:65534:65534:SunOS 4.x Nobody:/:
and for group:
root::0:root
other::1:
bin::2:root,bin,daemon
sys::3:root,bin,sys,adm
adm::4:root,adm,daemon
uucp::5:root,uucp
mail::6:root
tty::7:root,adm
lp::8:root,lp,adm
nuucp::9:root,nuucp
staff::10:
daemon::12:root,daemon
sysadmin::14:
smmsp::25:smmsp
nobody::60001:
noaccess::60002:
nogroup::65534:
Jörg
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
schilling@fokus.gmd.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
Reply to: