Re: Spec Updates
On 14 Feb 2001, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> A couple of notes:
> - Table 1.3 mentions the SOnames of the libs, those should go into the
> architecture dependend section (also in the following sections,
> e.g. section 10.1)
> - Chapter 9.1 mentions the name of the dynamic linker as
> /lib/ld-lsb.so.1. What happens if I want to run e.g. ia32 LSB
> compliant apps on ia64? Shouldn't we make the name also
> architecture dependend?
Yes to both of these. I just haven't gotten tot hat step yet. Last night
was just the first pass at splitting this stuff up.
> - You didn't add my definitions for 10.3. Almost all "What is this"
> comments should be filled in with the information I send you last
> week.
Someone is working on these, it just hasn't been committed yet.
> - 10.4.2 mentions "clog" as a data symbol. That's wrong, clog is a
> function.
OK, that I can fix 8-)
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson anderson@metrolink.com
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500 voice: 803.951.3630
http://www.metrolink.com/ XFree86 Core Team
Creative Applications Lab Chair - SIGGRAPH 2001
Reply to: