[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism



On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:41:02AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > their web pages are themselves (/var/www, file:/var/www/foo.html). It's
> > not unreasonable for software to want to send mail, but that would mean
> > it'd need to use /usr/sbin/sendmail, not write to /var/mail/* directly.
> Think about mail _client_ applications. Elm, mutt etc do need to know where
> mail lives and do write back to it

MAIL=/home/aj/inbox

It's a good default to have, but it's something users and admins
may reasonably want to change; so not having it shouldn't break LSB
compliance. Consider a distribution which puts mail in $HOME/mail, temp
files in $HOME/.tmp; sets MAIL and TMPDIR appropriately, and tries to
avoid having any world-writable directories.

(This doesn't cause a problem as far as Debian's concerned, though)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
  do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
                      -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)

Attachment: pgp2s1g6sTJTP.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: