Re: [PROPOSAL] (Ch.16 FHS) be more specific on file/dir permissions
- To: lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
- Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] (Ch.16 FHS) be more specific on file/dir permissions
- From: Johannes Poehlmann <jhp@caldera.de>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:07:09 +0100
- Message-id: <20010201110709.B22953@caldera.de>
- Reply-to: Johannes Poehlmann <jhp@caldera.de>
- In-reply-to: <20010127105933.B12907@cistron.nl>; from wichert@cistron.nl on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:59:33AM +0100
- References: <20010104134004.A28627@caldera.de> <E14EBu8-0005qn-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010104184232.B8891@caldera.de> <20010127105933.B12907@cistron.nl>
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:59:33AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Johannes Poehlmann wrote:
> > Yes, as local sysadmin I want to be able to place a empty rhosts file
> > (owned by root) in home directories, to prevent users from opening
> > rsh security holes. To prevent the users from deleting .rhosts,
> > I need the sticky bit on the home directory.
> A homedirectory is owned by the user anyway, so he can easily remove
> that sticky bit. Or do you have home directories owned by root and
> have a seperate group for each user?
Hi Wichert,
I think it is not our job to impose whatever permission scheme to
local sysadmins or Distribution/System vendors.
I just want the local sysadmin to be able to have such a paraniod config
without loosing the possibility to install LSB compliant apps.
--
______ ___
/ ___/__/ / Caldera (Deutschland) GmbH
/ /_/ _ / /__ Naegelsbachstr. 49c, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
/_____/_/ /____/ software developer / lsb project
==== /____/ ===== Dipl. Inf. Johannes Poehlmann, mail: jhp@caldera.de
Caldera OpenLinux phone: ++49 9131 7192 335, fax: ++49 9131 7192 399
Reply to: