Re: Feedback on Ted T'so's initscripts proposal

To: vincent@ldsol.com (Vincent Renardias)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), kingdon@redhat.com (Jim Kingdon), lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on Ted T'so's initscripts proposal
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 17:27:28 +0000 (GMT)
Message-id: <[🔎] E12T6ih-0001op-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.20.0003091645040.1095-100000@v2.ldsol.com> from "Vincent Renardias" at Mar 09, 2000 04:57:45 PM

> Circular dependancies (involving 2 or more packages) has always been valid
> for Debian. Circular dependancies even are the recommended way to force

Not package dependancies - reread 

init script order dependancies

eg if you have 

	nfs needs networking

and /usr on nfs

and you install some 'mysql based network configuration database' app that
adds

	mysqlapp needs mysql

	mysql is on /usr so needs nfs

	nfs needs networking

That kind of script loop

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Feedback on Ted T'so's initscripts proposal
  - From: Vincent Renardias <vincent@ldsol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Questions about spec
Next by Date: Request for an LSB snapshot?
Previous by thread: Re: Feedback on Ted T'so's initscripts proposal
Next by thread: Re: Feedback on Ted T'so's initscripts proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread