Re: Playing with the spec

To: Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org, recipient list not shown: ;
Subject: Re: Playing with the spec
From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 08:58:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.21.0003020857420.13153-100000@trantor2.sc.metrolink.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10003020802490.9736-100000@bastion.hugo.vanderkooij.org>

On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:

> May I assume that the LSB spec is written in linuxdoc sgml?

That would be an incorrect assumption.

> And does the LSB team know that linuxdoc sgml is too restricted to write
> specs in?

The document is written in Docbook SGML.


                                Stuart

Stuart R. Anderson                               anderson@metrolink.com

Metro Link Incorporated                          South Carolina Office
4711 North Powerline Road                        129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309                   Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.938.0283                              voice: 803.951.3630
fax:   954.938.1982                              SkyTel: 800.405.3401
http://www.metrolink.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Playing with the spec
  - From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
- Re: Playing with the spec
  - From: Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl

References:
- Re: Playing with the spec
  - From: Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl

Prev by Date: Re: Playing with the spec
Next by Date: Re: Playing with the spec
Previous by thread: Re: Playing with the spec
Next by thread: Re: Playing with the spec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread