Re: Package System specification
David Cantrell wrote:
> I'm not against dependencies If there is a dependency, it should be the LSB.
> Written correctly, that could work and commercial vendors would have no problems
> porting or writing software for an LSB-compliant system. Anything that isn't
> in the specification would need to be provided by that vendor, as well as an
> installation system (it's not really a big deal...look at Star Office and
They're quite awful tools, actually, compared to a decent package