[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PAM and libpwdb

On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Andrew Morgan wrote:

> I don't believe libpwdb should be in any spec. From my perspective and
> that of others that have contributed to PAM, libpwdb was a fine idea
> back in the dark ages but now NSS is available (glibc), the case for
> libpwdb is much deminished. I would like to see NSS better documented
> though. ;)

Red Hat agrees with this, fwiw (and the pwdb author (gafton) is probably 
the strongest advocate of not using it).


|            "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand		      |
|                                                                             |
|  Linux Application Development  --  http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad   |

Reply to: