Re: PAM and libpwdb
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> I don't believe libpwdb should be in any spec. From my perspective and
> that of others that have contributed to PAM, libpwdb was a fine idea
> back in the dark ages but now NSS is available (glibc), the case for
> libpwdb is much deminished. I would like to see NSS better documented
> though. ;)
Red Hat agrees with this, fwiw (and the pwdb author (gafton) is probably
the strongest advocate of not using it).
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand |
| |
| Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
Reply to: