Re: lib lists

To: anderson@metrolink.com (Stuart Anderson)
Cc: lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: lib lists
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:39:15 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <[🔎] E10sDTh-0002PF-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.BSF.3.96.990610181729.431l-100000@trantor.sc.metrolink.com> from "Stuart Anderson" at Jun 10, 99 06:30:41 pm

> I've included libdb in the spec because it provides some of the SUS interfaces.
(and its important only those are specified)

> Similar thing for ncurses.3.4 and ncurses.4

ncurses.4 is current

> libstdc++ probably should be in our list if we manage to get C++ defined
> at all. We have to visit name mangling rules and .init/.fini behavior though.
> It would be difficult to disallow C++ though.

Leave C++ out until cygnus provide some real roadmap

> libz seems like it should be in.

Yep

> How many of these libraries have a stable formal description that we can
> reference?

Most of the "desktop" ones I think

Reply to:

References:
- lib lists
  - From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>

Prev by Date: lib lists
Next by Date: Re: lib lists
Previous by thread: lib lists
Next by thread: Re: lib lists
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread