Previously gk4@us.ibm.com wrote: > Then is the ultimate goal to create a GNU libmta.so or libmapi.so for > UNIX/Linux? Could we note this in the LSB specification that this is > what is needed for consistency, then create an LSB/GNU todo to have a new > subproject created? Do we really want to start a new project, suddenly announce it to be the standard and then expect everyone to jump to it because the LSB says so? That sounds like the best way to make it fail.. the focus should be on documenting and standardizing existing, well-known behaviour. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpLJahXlFU5N.pgp
Description: PGP signature