Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 5)
- From: email@example.com (Kai Henningsen)
- Date: 17 Jul 1999 10:12:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 7L17po6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
- In-reply-to: <19990624161130.B4351@ntrnet.net>
- References: <199906241923.MAA20037@sodium.transmeta.com> <199906232249.PAA07560@sodium.transmeta.com> <19990624104342.B22704@Wotan.suse.de> <199906241923.MAA20037@sodium.transmeta.com> <19990624161130.B4351@ntrnet.net>
firstname.lastname@example.org (Jim Knoble) wrote on 24.06.99 in <19990624161130.B4351@ntrnet.net>:
> På 1999-Jun-24 klokka 12:23:59 -0700 skrivet Daniel Quinlan:
> : I don't think it would be a good idea to switch away from the current
> : (Debian) practice in this way. It doesn't really buy you anything
> : except less typing or a slightly different way to handle it.
> ... except that it makes more sense, and now's the chance to get it
Don't you mean *less* sense?
I don't see how calling a "restart" action "reload" can reasonably be