[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Shared Libraries and naming conventions

> recommand that such an effort make a much stronger effort to maintain
> binary compatibility than the glibc folks have occasionally shown in the
> past.


> In the long term, having such a contaminated code as is in glibc 2.1
> would really hurt the interests of the Linux community, IMO.  It may be

The only problem code I can find is libio. libdb has other oddities but
the license seems to be sane

Reply to: