Re: compiler
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> I had the same thing in mind. lsbcc can actually be a script that
> calls the correct compiler for LSB as well as reset include path, define/
> undefine any symbols (__LSB__ ??), etc. In recent work with a cross env, it
> was similarly useful to have cc, ld, ar and some of the bin utils wrapped in
> scripts also. We might want to consider something similar if there turns out
> to be a useful reason.
It can be *whatever*; the spec shouldn't make any promises. I was
planning on implementing lsbcc as a gcc spec file, but that's not
critical.
We may want to provide ld and ar ones as well, though I doubt it. I don't
think folks should ever use ld directly, and ar is extremely independent
of the build environment.
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "For the next two hours, VH1 will be filled with foul-mouthed, |
| crossdressing Australians. Viewer discretion is advised." |
| |
| Linux Application Development -- http://www.redhat.com/~johnsonm/lad |
Reply to: