[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: removing architecture dependencies



> >> The xml for individual packages occasionally
> >> contains architecture dependencies.  It would
> >> be nice to abstract these out to the extent
> >> possible - perhaps to definitions in
> >> entities/packages?
> > 
> > Yes!, I think that is the way to go.
> 
> definately, although it does not help us with things like 
> bin86 which ia32
> needs but none of the other arches do.

There are going to need to be some ways to handle
architecture specifics beyond what I mentioned above.

For example, before an Itanium kernel tree can be used for
anything (including, I think, generating the headers),
a rather massive ia64-specific patch has to be applied.
I don't hear any noises that that's going to change, they're
still generating such patches for 2.5.18 or whatever
that line is up to.

I guess one approach might be to have some of the
files presented as foo.xml.in and munched into the
right form for the target processor by the
configure script.  I gather conditional code is
not an option :-)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-impl-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org



Reply to: