> > Is there anything we should do here? > > > > Mats > > I grabbed the version of rpm that fits the LSB requirements. > rpm 4 does not > -- it does too much and would allow packages in beyond the > LSB requirements. > > There is no reason to change the rpm we have, move along (-: If the current rpm is sufficient (mostly I ask because the *other* rpm version we're tracking is the current one), and presumably comes bundled with its own db, is the db3 build even needed?