[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Answer to common failures?



At 2002/7/18 15:07-0700  Wichmann, Mats D writes:
> 	
> ************************************************************************
> 	/tset/LSB.os/devclass/grantpt_L/T.grantpt_L 2	Failed
> 	
> 		Test Information:
> 	grantpt(5) did not give correct results
> 	ERRNO VALUES: expected: 9 (EBADF), observed: 25 (ENOTTY)
> 
> 	
> ************************************************************************
> 	/tset/LSB.os/devclass/grantpt_L/T.grantpt_L 3	Failed
> 	
> 		Test Information:
> 	grantpt(5) did not give correct results
> 	ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 25 (ENOTTY)

Are you running the tests using something like screen?

> ************************************************************************
> 	/tset/LSB.os/genuts/ftw/T.ftw 4	Failed
> 	
> 		Test Information:
> 	ftw(./ftw_d.1, ..., 2) returned -1 instead of 0
> 	ftw did not call function with argument FTW_DNR
> 	although the root of the file tree given was
> 	read-only
> 
> 	
> ************************************************************************
> 	/tset/LSB.os/genuts/nftw/T.nftw 10	Failed
> 	
> 		Test Information:
> 	ftw(./ftwD1/ftw_d.1, ..., 2) returned -1 instead of 0
> 	ftw did not call function with argument FTW_DNR
> 	although the root of the file tree given was
> 	read-only

I think these 2 have been fixed in glibc CVS (Thorsten would know better).

> ************************************************************************
> 	/tset/LSB.os/ioprim/readv_L/T.readv_L 24	Failed
> 	
> 		Test Information:
> 	iov[0].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[0].iov_len = 2098176
> 	iov[1].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1].iov_len = 2098176
> 	iov[2].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[2].iov_len = 2098176
>       ...(lines omitted)
> 	iov[1022].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1022].iov_len = 2098176
> 	iov[1023].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1023].iov_len = 2098176
> 	readv(5, iov, 1024) did not behave as expected
> 	RETURN VALUES: expected: -1, observed: 36
> 	ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 0 (NO ERROR)
> 
> 	
> ************************************************************************
> 	/tset/LSB.os/ioprim/writev_L/T.writev_L 30	Failed
> 	
> 		Test Information:
> 	iov[0].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[0].iov_len = 2098176
> 	iov[1].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1].iov_len = 2098176
> 	iov[2].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[2].iov_len = 2098176
>       ...(lines omitted)
> 	iov[1022].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1022].iov_len = 2098176
> 	iov[1023].iov_base = 0x4013d008, iov[1023].iov_len = 2098176
> 	writev(7, iov, 1024) did not behave as expected:
> 	RETURN VALUES: expected: -1, observed: 2147483647
> 	ERRNO VALUES: expected: 22 (EINVAL), observed: 0 (NO ERROR)

These two are in the FAQ (kernel fixes).

http://www.linuxbase.org/test/lsb-runtime-test-faq.html

Incidentally I believe Alan Cox now has a different fix for these that
went into 2.5.

Regards,

Chris
-- 
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-impl-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org



Reply to: