Re: Testing of lsbdev and sample implementation
First off, thank's for working through all of this. Trying it out and finding
out what happens is exactly the kind of feedback we need right now.
Technically, if rsh isn't a LSB specified command, then it shouldn't be in
SI, and an application shouldn't be calling out to it. Possibly, we need to
add rsh (and ssh), but it should be added to the spec first.
Similar thing for fnmatch. If it is useful, and is well defined, then maybe
we should add it to the spec.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Marvin Heffler wrote:
> I have been running some tests combining the latest LSB Development Package
> (lsbdev-1.0.7) and the latest LSB Sample Implementation
> (minimal-runtime-0.8.tar.gz) and have run into some problems getting the
> sample application, rsync, to execute. Basically I built rsync in lsbdev
> using the system headers (Debian system). The rsync app will not build
> using the set of headers currently in lsbdev. Following this I copied the
> resulting rsync file to the sample implementation directory. When I tried
> to run it I ran into a series of problems. Here's what I saw.
>
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson anderson@metrolink.com
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500 voice: 803.951.3630
http://www.metrolink.com/ XFree86 Core Team
Reply to: