Re: LSB1.1: /proc/cpuinfo
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:34:34PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "How could a standard compliance test find out that GNU rm includes a nonstandard
> option that gives GNU rm properties that are not allowed from SUSv2?"
It's irrelevant. If the standard says that undefined options produce
undefined behavior, the conclusion is obvious. If the standard says that
undefined options are disallowed, then you test to see whether the
program accepts undefined options. IOW, the specific behavior of
undefined options is orthogonal to your test.