Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)

["David L. Nicol" <david@kasey.umkc.edu>]

Dan Kegel wrote:
> 
> Jim Knoble wrote:
> >
> > Circa 2001-Apr-30 14:06:00 -0400 dixit Stuart Anderson:
> >
> > : On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > :
> > : > Fundamentally its a specification about a set of behaviours. Not
> > : > who wrote which bits of the existing implementation. Its arguable
> > : > that the 'Linux' bit is in part inappropriate
> > :
> > : I'm open to suggestions for a word that starts with the letter 'L',
> > : and means ubiquitous. So far, all I've come up with is
> > : "Level-playing-field" 8-).
> 
> I'm in favor of having L stand for LSB, as Peter suggested.
> This is in the grand tradition of GNU, so RMS will surely be happy!
> 
> - Dan

Hah!  "LSB stands for LSB Standards Base."


ROTFL!



-- 
                      David Nicol 816.235.1187 dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu
                                              Parse, munge, repeat.