Re: LSB on /.
John,
Our conversation was a great education on the issue and I, too, think we are in
agreement. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this.
John H Terpstra wrote:
> Dave,
>
> I think we have said enough on this issue. I believe we are not really in
> disagreement at all. The LSB Spec is needed to get commercial applications
> on Linux. We need to address ISV needs. We need a standard that defines
> Linux, the LSB Spec v1.0 gets this under way, but this like open source
> development in general is an iterative process. We will get there.
>
> Above all, let's work harder together to make Linux so attractive to end
> users that the choice of desktop lpatform is a no brainer decision. Think
> of it, we have a way to go. Let's keep working. Thanks for you input.
>
> - John T.
>
> ---
> | John H Terpstra, VP Technology
> | Cell: +1 801 368 4066, Office: (650) 553 9371
> | E-mail: jht@caldera.com
> |
> | Linux - the hope of the X-Files generation!
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-discuss-request@lists.linuxbase.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org
--
David VomLehn<br>
Work: David.VomLehn@Compaq.com<br>
Home: vomlehn@texas.net
Reply to: