Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> > If it should be changed, this is my favorite - but why? This is a
> > standard for Linux. If FreeBSD are interested, I doubt they are
> > interested in more than an easier time for their Linux compatiblity
> > layer: After all, most Linux distributions and the LSB is leaning
>
> But thats a very important thing. If you have a common binary interface you
> can pick the underlying kernel that best suits each task. We aren't mirkosoft,
> lock-in is bad.
I'm not saying "make things difficult for FreeBSD". I'm just
preferring a "let's not try to make it everything to everyone"
approach, and getting something done - focus on the task at hand.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
Reply to: