Re: LSB & FHS 2.2

[Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>]

Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@transmeta.com> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger writes:
> 
> > The current LSB Draft mentions FHS 2.2 which has not been released
> > yet.  IMO we can't release the LSB with a reference to a not yet
> > existant standard.
> > 
> > We haven't given an Action Item to Daniel Quinlan to resolve this
> > situation at the New York meeting a fortnight ago but I propose to add
> > this as an action item.  
> > 
> > Dan, can you release FHS 2.2 until Wednesday next week (21st)? Or how
> > do you propose to resolve this situation?
> 
> Yes, it will be a beta release of FHS 2.2 (for public review and comments).

Dan,

did you release yesterday the FHS 2.2 as beta release?  I haven't seen
any notice of it.

Since LSB depends on FHS 2.2 and we'd like to get LSB out of the door
soon, I'm very irritated that it seems that FHS 2.2 is not released
yet.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj