Re: File Systems.
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote:
> So even if Red Hat doesn't want to make this move, *someone* should.
> Consider that a challenge to all the distro representatives here. ;)
The flip side is changing to FHS 2.0, then FHS 2.1, then LSB 1.0 would
cause ongoing customer pain rather then a one-time event, and would likely
make folks frustruated with the LSB.
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand |
| |
| Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
Reply to: