Re: Comments on GNOME Foundation?
I agree with this - however the reality is that appart the problem of
file hierarchy and package format, there are Linux distributions on
which you simply cannot install a Gnome package until you install all
the Gnome base packages. It's the same for KDE but you will find KDE
on most Linux distros. That's the reason why with Mandrake for example
you will be installed KDE + Gnome by default most times (among other
>From the beginning I've understood that LSB was graphical-desktop
independant which means that Gnome or KDE are not in the scope.
However I personnally think that this is a huge issue because modern
applications require graphical libs to run. Under Linux there is no
default high-level API for graphics programming [X11/Xlib is lowlevel
and who would program a big app with the native X11 calls?]: basically
you have the choice among KDE-libs, Gnome-libs and LessTiff.
LSB can't make a choice between those environments, especially between
KDE and Gnome for the reasons that everybody will understand here.
Nevertheless I *do* think that LSB should consider this graphics
environment problem because modern OSes are much used through a
graphical screen and a mouse pointer.
So why wouldn't LSB decide that Linux has *two* default graphical
interfaces: Gnome AND KDE?
Shaya Potter a écrit :
> In my humble opinion (and with the disclaimer that I work for IBM now on
> linux, and have friends at helix), I think it's outside the scope. We
> said the entire time that the LSB is about getting BINARIES running on
> the different linux distributions. Namely ISV produced software. They
> are not ignoring it, as in reality it could make their life much easier.
> Currently helix has to make a version of helix-gnome for each platform
> they want it to work on. If they could just make it for the "lsb" platform
> it could make their life easier. So, the gnome foundation is fairly
> orthogonal to the LSB. If someone wants to write a gnome app that runs on
> mutliple distributions they have to rely on something like "helix-gnome"
> aka a standard release AND the lsb. Samething similiar would probably
> have to happen with KDE in the future.
> shaya potter
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Jeff Tranter wrote:
> > I'm curious what the LSB reaction to the GNOME foundation is.
> > Are they ignoring the work of the LSB and the process in
> > place to promote standards? Or is this all outside the scope
> > of the LSB? Would you like to see them working with
> > freedesktop.org?
> > --
> > The address in the headers is not the poster's real email address. Do not send
> > private mail to the poster using your mailer's "reply" feature. CC's of mail
> > to mailing lists are OK. Problem reports to "firstname.lastname@example.org".
> > The poster's email address is "email@example.com".
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email email@example.com
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email email@example.com
< Gael DUVAL http://www.mandrake.com >