Re: RFC
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 06:54:07AM -0800, Robert W. Current wrote:
> Linux was once fairly complete at 10M, now it's easily 500M in /usr, and
> nothing in /usr/local or /opt. That's starting to get rediculus. The OS
> is not 500M... That's the issue. So, why is there 500+M of crap in
> /usr/bin?
Why would it be better to have 500M in /opt? That's the sticking point.
You're saying that you don't want a standard that allows distributions
to put things in /usr, and I'm saying that there are distributions that
want to do things that way. Can you offer a reasoned argument to support
why your way is right and the other way is wrong?
--
Mike Stone
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC
- From: Jochem Huhmann <joh@gmx.net>
- Re: RFC
- From: Daniel Bradley <daniel@dstc.qut.edu.au>
- References:
- RE: RFC
- From: "Robert W. Current" <rob@entropy.current.nu>