Re: [gopher] Gopher+ support in the community
James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not opposed to Gopher over TLS, but I definitely would not want it to
> > be
> > mandatory, and it would increase client burden as well particularly with
> > respect to certificate management.
> >
>
> +1 on Gopher over TLS being optional.
I'm also in support of optional TLS. As for gopher+ I think it's the
proverbial kicked dead equine. BTW, why are we discussing TLS in a
"gopher+" thread? They aren't really related - better to give TLS its
own thread, no?
Jeff / gopher://jgw.mdns.org
_______________________________________________
Gopher-Project mailing list
Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project
Reply to: