Re: [gopher] Gophernicus, caps and revival of gopher++
On 2010-09-11 18:55, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
This got me thinking about my failed attempt at extending the protocol
to make it possible for the client to include metadata in the request.
You're referring to your extensions to the menu format, right?
No, not really, the TITLE you're probably referring to works as is.
I'm talking about my attempts to get virtual hosting, charset encodings
etc into the protocol... I had it all working apart from the fact that
an enchanced client broke a few old still running servers.
Gopher-Project mailing list