[gopher] Re: Gopherness
I don't think the Gopher network would benefit from balkanization at
this late stage.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Jay Nemrow <jnemrow@quix.us> wrote:
> I would also be a bit concerned about backward-compatibility (as I
> always am). When we talk about changes like this, I suggest we call
> the protocol created with modern changes something besides just
> "Gopher". Perhaps Goph08 or something like that. Then you could say,
> "hey, I run a Goph08 server" or "my client is both Gopher and Goph08
> compatible."
Reply to: