[gopher] Re: item types of unusual interest

[Alessandro Selli <dhatarattha@route-add.net>]

Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> This is interesting. Note particularly the 'w' item type. I think these are
> just assignments Netscape pulled out of their rear, unless someone knows
> different?

   Compared to RFC-1436 it also lacks the "+" itemtype, the "redundant 
server" item.
   How is the "w" itemtype supposed to be used?  Would this
hFloodgap.com (Web pages)	URL:http://www.floodgap.com/

appear as:

wFloodgap.com (Web pages)	http://www.floodgap.com/
?

   I cannot find the "h" itemtype defined in RFC-1436, will you please
shed some light about it?

> Pardon the web URL ;)

   How tasteless!  :-)

-- 
Alessandro Selli
Tel: 340.839.73.05
http://alessandro.route-add.net