[gopher] Re: "groxies"
> > This would work fine for Gopher+ servers, but non-Gopher+ servers would
> > probably see the groxy-host\tport portion as a request (Bucktooth, for
> > example, would definitely get confused).
> No, because this is a request being specifically sent to a proxy, not a
> server. Clients will need to know when they're sending the data to a
> proxy, but the server should never see data come in this form.
True, fair enough. If no one else has any other concerns over this method
of implementing a groxy, I'll throw together a proof-of-concept.
--
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser@floodgap.com
-- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I'm still right. -------
Reply to: