[gopher] Re: Announcing Gopher::Server 0.1 for Perl
--- Timm Murray <tmurray-gopher@wumpus-cave.net>
wrote:
<snipped>
> Yes, I have some ideas on a database-driven Gopher
> server, where
> the physical files would be stored as SHA1 sums on
> the filesystem
> and the database would point to them. Thanks to the
> magic of
> relational databases, different file formats can be
> easily stored
> as the same database row, but that row would relate
> to a 'formats'
> table that would specify the given MIME/Gopher type
> for seperate
> files that contain the same information. The whole
> idea is to make
> good use of +VIEWS. This is all dream-mode stuff at
> this point, and
> I'll need to implement Gopher+ first.
That all sounds very exciting.
> Also, thanks for your work on Net::Gopher. Using
> some of the
> Net::Gopher classes that were already available made
> implementing
> Gopher::Server a lot easier. The only constructive
> critisim I have
> is that the Net::Gopher::Response class seemed too
> oreinted twards the
> client side of things, so Gopher::Server::Response
> replicates the
> functionality needed to for Response classes for
> servers. In the
> future, I'd like to see Net::Gopher and
> Gopher::Server using the same
> Response class. Though ATM, I don't remember what
> it was that
> convinced me that Net::Gopher::Response wouldn't
> work. I'll have to
> look over the code and get back to you.
Net::Gopher:Response really isn't intended for
anything other than client-side response
receiving/manipulation, and not response creation. (In
fact, the POD doesn't even tell you how to create
Net::Gopher::Response objects and populate them, just
how to manipulate them.) When I started work on my
server, I ended up wanting something like
Net::Gopher::Request to store parsed requests... But
the namespace "Net::Gopher::Request" is a little to
specific. It would be nice to eventually have general
purpose, reusable request/response classes (e.g.,
Gopher::Request and Gopher::Response) like LWP does.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
Reply to: