[gopher] Re: \n.\n
On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 08:30 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
>> much data was actually available to read -- or a code indicating that
>> the other side has finished transmitting and has closed the connection
>
> Actually, John, using "close" to signal end-of-file is a classic and
> *very dangerous* practice. Additionally, HTTP/1.0 does *not* use
I was choosing my words carefully while trying to avoid being overly
complex!
Actually, the server should do a shutdown() followed by a close(). In
the client, read() will properly return EOF in this case.
What we gain by \n.\n is only the ability to detect that a text file has
not been transmitted in full. If this happens, every client that I know
of will simply ignore the error and display what it got.
What we lose is the ability to reliably transfer text files containing
\n.\n without modification.
So, in essence, we have not gained anything by that \n.\n to date.
> "close" to indicate end-of-file, but rather content-length. In fact,
Yet often HTTP/1.0 headers omit content-length (esp CGI).
> can cause a TCP "close", not just a process on the other end issuing
> a close system call.
What of these would we handle materially different than we would with
the \n.\n support?
> I would suggest not altering the gopher0 protocol at this late a stage.
> If you want to modify something, create gopher++ or gopher2, don't
> go willy-nilly modifying a protocol that has been established for so
> long.
For most everything else, I'd agree. But we have a case where:
1. New clients will communicate just fine with old servers. Text files
will just have an extra . at the end.
2. New servers will communicate just fine with old clients. The clients
stop at EOF anyway. Several already do not care about \n.\n.
> Additionally, "\n.\n" is a well-known specifier for end-of-length, and
> it is used in POP3, SMTP and several other line-oriented protocols.
But there's a difference. Gopher will never read more commands from the
client during the single connection. SMTP, for instance, will. With
Gopher, the client sends a filename and \n and that's ALL. The client
could even do a shutdown() at this point. (And probably should.)
-- John
Reply to: