[gopher] Re: gopher 3.0.4 imminent
On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 08:11 AM, Robert Hahn wrote:
> That's quite the list. Thanks for your contributions.
Thanks!
> Now, while I haven't pulled a copy of 3.0.4 from CVS yet, I've a
> question: I don't know how you did the rewrite, but I'd be interested
> to know if the steps you took rewriting the code resulted in
> rendering irrevalent the note about compiling in OS X under UFS...
No, they did not. However, I can still try to accomplish that.
Unfortunately, MacOS X is a nasty case because it doesn't behave like a
Unix "should". I'm still uncertain why there even is a problem at all,
because even with that behavior, the difference between #include
"regex.h" and #include <regex.h> should do it. However, if necessarily,
I will rename it for a future version.
-- John
Reply to: