Your message dated Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:45:09 +0100 with message-id <apnfsvbpqx6bqhu66ld26xmgpicxo4rwbj6op2zu4h4viwccpp@xswhzhkptedj> and subject line Re: Bug#1095868: kb's fetched much less than prediction has caused the Debian Bug report #1095868, regarding kb's fetched much less than prediction to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1095868: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095868 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: kb's fetched much less than prediction
- From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:49:32 +0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 8734gicjqb.3.fsf@jidanni.org>
Package: apt Version: 2.9.28 Severity: minor Odd, it said it needed to get 6538 kB, but it only ended up needing 351 kB. Probably due to a previous half run which got aborted by a network failure, so there were probably /partial files lying around or something. # aptitude install ~Uemacs The following packages will be upgraded: emacs emacs-bin-common (emacs-nox D: emacs-bin-common) emacs-common (emacs-nox D: emacs-common) emacs-el emacs-nox The following packages will NOT be UPGRADED: cpp-14{a} ... 5 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 43 not upgraded. Need to get 6538 kB/40.7 MB of archives. After unpacking 1024 B will be used. Get: 1 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian unstable/main arm64 emacs-nox arm64 1:29.4+1-6 [6520 kB] Get: 2 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian unstable/main arm64 emacs all 1:29.4+1-6 [18.6 kB] Fetched 351 kB in 3s (107 kB/s) P.S., $ grep -v ^// /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10jidanni APT::Default-Release "unstable";//just order them in sources.list UNTRUE APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant false; APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant false; APT::Cache::AllVersions false; APT::Clean-Installed false; //important, see man apt-get APT::Get::Fix-Missing true; //even though 825897 says should be off APT::Get::Purge true; APT::Install-Recommends false; APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages true; APT::Periodic::Enable false; Acquire::PDiffs true; Acquire::http::No-Cache true;//564829 Aptitude::CmdLine::Always-Prompt true; Aptitude::CmdLine::Show-Deps true;//587582@bugs.debian.org Aptitude::CmdLine::Show-Why true;//511230@bugs.debian.org Aptitude::CmdLine::Verbose 1; Aptitude::Purge-Unused true; Binary::apt::APT::Keep-Downloaded-Packages true; Acquire::Queue-mode access;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>, 1095868-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1095868: kb's fetched much less than prediction
- From: David Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:45:09 +0100
- Message-id: <apnfsvbpqx6bqhu66ld26xmgpicxo4rwbj6op2zu4h4viwccpp@xswhzhkptedj>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 8734gicjqb.3.fsf@jidanni.org>
- References: <[🔎] 8734gicjqb.3.fsf@jidanni.org>
Am Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 04:49:32PM +0800, schrieb Dan Jacobson: > Probably due to a previous half run which got aborted by a network > failure, so there were probably /partial files lying around or something. […] > Need to get 6538 kB/40.7 MB of archives. After unpacking 1024 B will be used. > Get: 1 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian unstable/main arm64 emacs-nox arm64 1:29.4+1-6 [6520 kB] > Get: 2 http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/debian unstable/main arm64 emacs all 1:29.4+1-6 [18.6 kB] […] > Fetched 351 kB in 3s (107 kB/s) You had emacs-nox mostly downloaded already in partial/, but apt can't know beforehand if what is present can be reused. It will request the file from the server with the remark: "I have got that much data already, if that makes sense and you can, just give me the rest". The server is free to answer with either the remaining data or ignore the remark and sent the entire file (again). So, as we can't know ahead of time apt assumes the worst case. Just be happy that in your specific case it turns out that this was too pessimistic. Closing as not a bug. Best regards David KalnischkiesAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---