Bug#880499: apt-cache rdepends outputs too many dependencies
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 minor
>>>>> Tom <bug@users.ch.eu.org> writes:
[Please do not Cc: me, for I’m “on the list,” so to say, and
I try to reserve my inbox for private communication only.]
> I try to find all reverse dependencies of a certain package. I’m
> only interested in “Depends” relations, no Recommends, Suggests, etc.
> So, for instance, for the aptitude package, I do:
> $ apt-cache rdepends "aptitude" --installed \
> --no-pre-depends \
As an aside, I’m going to question whether omitting Pre-Depends:
is really what you’re looking for, as Pre-Depends: is essentially
a stronger / specialized form of Depends:. For instance, Debian
Policy Manual states [1]:
Pre-Depends
This field is like Depends, except that it also forces dpkg to
complete installation of the packages named before even starting the
installation of the package which declares the pre-dependency […]
[1] http://debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
> --no-suggests --no-recommends --no-conflicts --no-breaks \
> --no-replaces --no-enhances
Also note that at some point apt-cache acquired the --important
option, which seems effectively the same as the above [2]
(though the man page somehow does not mention rdepends here):
-i, --important
Print only important dependencies; for use with unmet and depends.
Causes only Depends and Pre-Depends relations to be printed.
Configuration Item: APT::Cache::Important.
[2] http://manpages.debian.org/unstable/apt/apt-cache.8.en.html
> aptitude
> Reverse Depends:
> aptitude:i386
> aptitude:i386
> aptitude:i386
> aptitude:i386
> aptitude:i386
> But there are no reverse dependencies on aptitude, as reported be
> aptitude:
> i aptitude
> [… some lines skipped …]
> --\ Packages which depend on aptitude (23)
> --\ Depends (5)
> p aptitude-robot 1.5.1-1
[…]
What I see above is actually exactly the opposite: the apt-cache
call reports the aptitude:i386 package several times over, but
/no/ (installed, due to the --install option) packages dependent
on it, while aptitude reports a number of (non-installed,
presumably) dependencies, such as aptitude-robot.
Were there dependent packages satisfying the criteria given,
the output would contain something like:
Reverse Depends:
aptitude-robot
aptitude:amd64
The output may be a tad confusing (and likely worth fixing),
but that’s pretty much the only issue I can discern here.
--
FSF associate member #7257 http://am-1.org/~ivan/
Reply to: